Why Your MVP Looks Like Every Other MVP

You shipped something. It works. Users can sign up, click buttons, and accomplish something real. You should feel good about that.

But you also know the truth. Your product looks like every other AI-built MVP on the internet. Same rounded corners. Same purple-blue gradient. Same shadcn components. Same Tailwind defaults.

This isn't a failure of taste. It's a failure of decision-making.

The Problem With Defaults

When you build with Bolt, Cursor, or Lovable, you inherit a set of visual decisions made by someone else. Those decisions were made to be inoffensive. Broadly acceptable. Appropriate for the widest possible range of use cases.

In other words, generic.

"Genericity is the natural result of not choosing. Every dropdown, every button radius, every font weight carries a default. And defaults compound."

One default becomes two. Two becomes twenty. By the time you ship, your product is a stack of decisions you never made.

Linear understood this trap early. Co-founder Karri Saarinen explained why they obsessed over every detail: "We wanted Linear to feel like it was made by someone who cared. Every pixel should feel intentional." The result is a product that stands apart from every other project management tool. Not because of its features. Because of its decisions.

Why Users Notice (Even When They Don't Know They Notice)

Your users don't consciously evaluate your border radius. They don't analyze your font stack. But they feel the difference between a product that made decisions and one that didn't.

Researchers at Stanford's Persuasive Technology Lab found that visual design is the primary factor in website credibility judgments. Their study showed that 46.1% of users assess credibility based on design elements alone. Not content. Not features. Design.

"A product that looks like everything else sends a signal: this was assembled, not crafted. That signal undermines trust."

When Stripe launched in 2011, payment processing was a commodity. Every competitor offered similar technical capabilities. But Stripe looked different. Their landing page had custom illustrations. Their API documentation was beautifully typeset. Their error messages were clear and specific.

None of this affected whether payments would process. All of it affected whether developers would choose Stripe over alternatives.

The AI Acceleration Problem

The situation has gotten worse. Before AI coding tools, generic products required effort to build. You had to copy templates manually. You had to configure component libraries. The friction created opportunities for intentional choices.

Now, generic is effortless. You can ship a complete, functional, utterly forgettable product in an afternoon.

Pieter Levels, the indie hacker behind Nomad List and RemoteOK, put it bluntly: "The barrier to entry has collapsed. Anyone can build. That means the only differentiator is taste."

When your competitor can ship the same features in the same timeframe with the same tools, features stop mattering. What matters is whether your product feels different.

What Intentional Looks Like

Study any product that "feels right" and you'll find locked decisions.

Notion chose warm colors when every productivity app was cold blue. They chose rounded corners when sharp edges were trending. They chose playful illustrations when minimal was the default.

Each choice was a bet. Each bet was documented and enforced.

"An intentional product makes visible choices. The color isn't blue because blue is safe. The font isn't Inter because Inter is popular. The buttons aren't rounded because rounded is trending. Every visual element is a statement: I decided this."

The constraint shapes the identity.

Start With What You Refuse

You don't need a designer. You don't need a brand agency. You need constraints.

Start with refusals: - What competitors do you never want to be confused with? - What visual patterns are overused in your category? - What aesthetic would make your ideal user distrust you?

The answers become your guardrails.

Then make three locked decisions: 1. One color that defines your accent 2. One typographic pairing that defines your voice 3. One layout principle that defines your structure

Apply them everywhere. Refuse to deviate.

The Vox Animus Approach

Vox Animus exists to structure this process. The 9-sprint discovery doesn't ask "what color do you like?" It asks "what must your brand never be mistaken for?"

The output isn't a mood board. It's an enforceable Brand Schema. Voice rules you can paste into AI prompts. Constraints that prevent drift.

"Your product was intentional. Your brand should be too."

The difference between a generic MVP and a memorable one isn't talent. It isn't budget. It's whether someone sat down and made decisions on purpose.

That someone should be you.

---

Sources & Further Reading

1. Stanford Web Credibility Research — Fogg, B.J., et al. (2003). "How Do Users Evaluate the Credibility of Web Sites?" Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. The study found that 46.1% of consumers considered visual appeal when assessing site credibility. Read the guidelines →

2. Linear Design Philosophy — Karri Saarinen, co-founder, has spoken extensively about quality and craftsmanship as Linear's first principles in interviews with First Round Review, Lenny's Newsletter, and others. Read the First Round interview →

3. Google Research on 50ms Judgments — Lindgaard et al. (2006) and subsequent Google/University of Basel research showed users form aesthetic judgments within 50 milliseconds, with low visual complexity correlating to higher appeal. Read the Google Research →